In the end, my Immaculate Heart will triumph.
This Tuesday past, an elderly priest, Father Jaques Hamel, was the first to usher in the age of islamic triumph that the current Pope has been inviting by his actions and rhetoric since the start of his pontificate. In this, he is perfectly in line with the example of his predecessor John Paul II whom he recently canonized. The elderly priest had his throat slit in ritual islamic fashion, while being forced to kneel before the altar where he was offering Mass.
Do not be blind to the significance of this act of submission!
Only the most obtuse would fail to see that islam is at war with the West and especially with the Catholic Church. Ever since Pope John Paul II kissed the Quran, the leaders of the Church have done all in their power to assure muslims that the Church will never even hint at the truth. Even after the brazen murder of an innocent Catholic priest during Mass, Pope Francis refuses to speak the truth (source) and thus fails to protect his flock.
This latest but most symbolic attack did not come about as an entirely unpredictable event. There have been several attacks, such as the Charlie Hebdo (Jan. 2015) and the Bataclan (Nov. 2015) and the Bastille Day massacre most recently. What has been the French response?
After the Charlie Hebdo attack, the French Ministry of defense launched the Sentinelle Organization. Its mandate: “to protect the French people and provide security in support of the Internal Security Forces at the most sensitive locations in Paris and in the provinces.” Sounds pretty good, right?
On the night of November 13, 2015, six armed members of this elite military group stood at the entrance of the Bataclan during the concert. Yet they took no action, even as the carnage continued. There was certainly much noise from the ongoing gunshots and screams of the victims. Yet these elite forces remained impassive, unresponsive at the entrance. (source and source).
Why? Because their rules of engagement did not permit it. These men were trained and armed and they outnumbered the attackers, yet did not engage because their rules did not “allow” them to. … Fascinating, isn’t it?
And now, let’s look at last Tuesday’s ritual murder, that quintessentially islamic event. To slit the throat of a fragile, elderly priest in the midst of offering worship presents a powerful symbol of the strength and determination of their religion doesn’t it? You can easily see the logic in their actions, once you descend to their level.
Did the French learn anything after Charlie Hebdo and Bataclan? Let’s see. In November, 2014, the little Normandy town where the priest was murdered was recognised by the police as a hotbed of islamic terrorist activity. In fact, last November, the local prefect of Seine Maritime, Pierre-Henry Maccioni, described the situation regarding the presence of radicalized Muslim youth in Seine-Maritime. According to his report, police had identified 140 high risk people in the department, thirty of whom were under “special surveillance.” Among those being watched were the two terrorists who committed the attack. (Source). In addition, an islamic terrorist hit list of Catholic Church sites was discovered by French police in April 2015. The church of Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray was on that list.
Coincidentally, adjacent to the church there was a mosque which was known to be frequented by islamic terrorists, including the notorious islamic executioner Maxime Hauchard and of course, the devout young man who honored Allah with the ritual killing of the priest on Tuesday. That fellow also wore distinctive jewelry, a tracker bracelet provided by the French police, which the same police thoughtfully turned off on weekdays, thus assuring that the police would not prevent the attack. (Source) Yes, it was merely jewelry because it is evident that the police never intended to use it to actually prevent its wearer from committing such carnage. The police had received credible information of a pending attack, and yet did not even use the very tracker which was designed to prevent such atrocities. Another amazing but true fact.
But the most ironic fact in all this, one which every single conciliarist Catholic must be made to grasp is this:
The very mosque that nurtured this murderous group of terrorists was built on a plot of land donated as a gesture of good will by the little parish of Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray! Yes, the conciliar Catholics of that little parish donated the land for the mosque that the attackers attended. (source).
Consider carefully all the above, and then tell me who is really responsible?
Who killed Father Hamel?
Please, pray the Rosary and confound satan and all those who serve him.
Immaculate Heart of Mary, Queen of our hearts, Mother of the Church, do thou offer to the Eternal Father the Precious Blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ, for the conversion of poor sinners, especially our Pontiff.
~ by evensong for love of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
Who Killed Father Hamel?
This latest but most symbolic attack did not come about as an entirely unpredictable event. There have been several attacks, such as the Charlie Hebdo (Jan. 2015) and the Bataclan (Nov. 2015) and the Bastille Day massacre most recently. What has been the French response?
After the Charlie Hebdo attack, the French Ministry of defense launched the Sentinelle Organization. Its mandate: “to protect the French people and provide security in support of the Internal Security Forces at the most sensitive locations in Paris and in the provinces.” Sounds pretty good, right?
On the night of November 13, 2015, six armed members of this elite military group stood at the entrance of the Bataclan during the concert. Yet they took no action, even as the carnage continued. There was certainly much noise from the ongoing gunshots and screams of the victims. Yet these elite forces remained impassive, unresponsive at the entrance. (source and source).
Why? Because their rules of engagement did not permit it. These men were trained and armed and they outnumbered the attackers, yet did not engage because their rules did not “allow” them to. … Fascinating, isn’t it?
And now, let’s look at last Tuesday’s ritual murder, that quintessentially islamic event. To slit the throat of a fragile, elderly priest in the midst of offering worship presents a powerful symbol of the strength and determination of their religion doesn’t it? You can easily see the logic in their actions, once you descend to their level.
Did the French learn anything after Charlie Hebdo and Bataclan? Let’s see. In November, 2014, the little Normandy town where the priest was murdered was recognised by the police as a hotbed of islamic terrorist activity. In fact, last November, the local prefect of Seine Maritime, Pierre-Henry Maccioni, described the situation regarding the presence of radicalized Muslim youth in Seine-Maritime. According to his report, police had identified 140 high risk people in the department, thirty of whom were under “special surveillance.” Among those being watched were the two terrorists who committed the attack. (Source). In addition, an islamic terrorist hit list of Catholic Church sites was discovered by French police in April 2015. The church of Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray was on that list.
Coincidentally, adjacent to the church there was a mosque which was known to be frequented by islamic terrorists, including the notorious islamic executioner Maxime Hauchard and of course, the devout young man who honored Allah with the ritual killing of the priest on Tuesday. That fellow also wore distinctive jewelry, a tracker bracelet provided by the French police, which the same police thoughtfully turned off on weekdays, thus assuring that the police would not prevent the attack. (Source) Yes, it was merely jewelry because it is evident that the police never intended to use it to actually prevent its wearer from committing such carnage. The police had received credible information of a pending attack, and yet did not even use the very tracker which was designed to prevent such atrocities. Another amazing but true fact.
But the most ironic fact in all this, one which every single conciliarist Catholic must be made to grasp is this:
The very mosque that nurtured this murderous group of terrorists was built on a plot of land donated as a gesture of good will by the little parish of Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray! Yes, the conciliar Catholics of that little parish donated the land for the mosque that the attackers attended. (source).
Consider carefully all the above, and then tell me who is really responsible?
Who killed Father Hamel?
Please, pray the Rosary and confound satan and all those who serve him.
Immaculate Heart of Mary, Queen of our hearts, Mother of the Church, do thou offer to the Eternal Father the Precious Blood of Our Lord Jesus Christ, for the conversion of poor sinners, especially our Pontiff.
~ by evensong for love of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.